Atheism or Religion?
To be religious or to be atheist? That is a question I have often asked myself and found difficult to answer. I never believed religion to be the absolute path towards god. Nor do I see god in the form as religion depicts. What annoys me is the vast loads of strict rituals and baseless restrictions imposed onto people, which appear completely meaningless. It is this strictness associated with religion, which later blends into culture, that worries me. It is this imposed adherence to a single path of life which makes absolutely no sense. Its annoying to hear a person say she does not eat meat, because her religion forbids her to do so! Can't they just dislike the taste or refrain from killing someone to fill their own stomach. At the same time, religion can have a nice side. In fact many religious occasions have given me some good memories. Memories of meeting lots of friends, distant relatives and having a good time.
At the other end of spectrum lies the school of atheism. But here again, there are ideas which you *must* adhere to. For eg, you must not believe in God. Ever seen an atheist who believes in God? I think God exists. Not in the way religion says he does, but he does. But atheism will forbid me from thinking so! If religion makes your ideas confined to a particular set, so does atheism. That means that atheism is a religion in itself!
Atheists are large proponents of logic and science. Their biggest arguments against God is "You cannot prove or show me God, so he must not". Well, you cannot prove something does not exist just because its not observable or it cannot be proved that it does exist. The leap of blind faith which is completely unscientific is something which raises eyebrows. But isn't blind faith a part of everyone's daily lives? We have some blind faith in a lot of things we do.
So we come to a standpoint. There are various schools of thought. Each having its own thought process. When a person becomes a part of a school, there is some "light" because of which, they are taking this step. Its important to respect this. If something makes someone content or even better, happy, that must be respected. Its this ignorance of respect which has created a lot of problems which we face today. I think I will respect religion, religious people, atheism, atheists and every other entity who comes in between, but I will choose to be none of them. The best "school", I can join is the school of open mindedness. A school where you respect everything (even the vegetarian lady), nothing is imposed on you. You get to enjoy any aspect of life which you think is enjoyable, and its not "against the rules" to do so.
This is what I stand by today. But if needed to extend this idea to accomodate some more good things in life, I will do it.
Not sure if my new school has a webpage, but if you know about it, let me know :)
7 Comments:
Very good post. The question you raised is a question I ask myself too. I believe in God but definitely not the way religion tells me to, but above all, like you, I believe in having an open mind and the respect for individual thinking.
Hm, open mindedness is definitely what you should be striving for, but in terms of ideology that best conforms to your ideas about god, I would look into agnosticism. In fact, I consider myself having the same ideology.
Basically, agnosticism proposes that, although God may exists, he is beyond our realm of cognizance (physical or mental) and as such we cannot gain any knowledge about him. This is fundamentally different from atheists who state that God doesn't exist because he cannot be proved.
@eldarath: Thanks for your observation. Agnosticism seems like a pretty good fit. It addresses matters from a very practical viewpoint. I am interested more in this and shall definitely look at the some of the works of prominent agnostics.
But I hope agnostics can face the fact, or allow other agnostics to have the freedom of thought that one day we can maybe decipher these concepts. It looks really impossible now, but maybe they are easier to understand one day.
good one kiddo!! I think we should be wary of any kind of "-isms" because whats true today might not be tomorrow and vice versa. so the important thing is to keep an open mind. btw i am a big believer in the Flying Spaghetti Monster!. check out our site!
Amen
I agree with your views on having an open mind, but I believe your definition of atheism is not entirely accurate. A true atheist does not say that I do not believe in God because you can't show him to me. An atheist says that unless I have sufficient testable and repeatable evidence that God exists, I will choose to believe that he does not. This is subtly different from saying that God doesn't exist because you can't show him to me. In fact, one of the most important things in atheism is to be ready to be proved wrong. Fundamentally, this is different from most religions who will not accept evidence that shows that quite a few of their claims are wrong. Atheists are proponents of the scientific method, and hence will actually gladly accept when proved wrong. Now, I agree that even among atheists there is a sect that are like the atheists you mention, but atheism does not advocate or support that. These are my views and you can choose to agree with them or not.
ok, so a coupla thoughts here:
1) i appreciate your idea of respect for all and i believe it applies to not only respecting belief's on god but everything overall.
2) several people often confuse religious beliefs with ritualism and taboos. in the larger picture, there is a sea of difference in believing in god or not. within it is the question of what god you believe in and even further is the question of the difference between following a certain religion and following its rituals.
3) your ideas on various isms i think are based on very limited knowledge in the sense that Sid has spoken about atheists or someone else talks about being agnostic. there is a whole spectrum of philosophy and writing in the area. some wki links may prove useful
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_belief
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existentialism
i guess, i did get a bit carried away since this is one area of philosophy that has always intrigued me. on a lighter note, this web-page of the new school you talk about may turn into an ism n itself! so beware :)
Brilliant dude!!!
Tesla said "The beauty of exact science is that it is not exact."
My interpretation: Between 0 and 1 there are infinite numbers. Between 0 and 0.1 there are, again, infinite numbers. When we sample, quantize and what not!!! it the beauty is lost!!!
Between your thoughts and mine (or for instance, anyone else) the dot product is always less than 1.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home